We each have a dominant style, which we use in managing, in
volunteering, in family relations, even in relaxing. A “hyper” person finds running more relaxing
than the melodic music enjoyed by a “quiet” person. Nevertheless, as managers of many different types
of people, we need to develop some of the qualities of our opposite style.
Mental focus is essential in adapting to a new style. Personally, as someone who feels more
comfortable in a well-organized environment, I must consciously reject an inner
drive to apply organizational techniques too early in the development of a new
idea. Crisply dividing up work can
easily kill the amorphous concepts that can coalesce into an excellent new
product or process. On the other hand, a
quiet person may need to come to a meeting with several prepared points in
order to have the confidence to speak up during discussions.
Oddly, when I have advised this practice of developing an
alternative style, the greatest fear expressed to me is the loss of one’s
dominant style. Perhaps this reflects a
fear of losing oneself. Good news: we
can’t lose our dominant style, even if we try.
The more stress we suffer, the more we will revert to our
dominant style as the easiest way to find solutions to problems. The real problem is that one style never adequately
addresses all crises; the real challenge is to discover how to supplement our
own style with alternative approaches.
This can be done by practicing, eventually incorporating elements of
other styles, or by surrounding ourselves with individuals who work in these
other styles.
We used to say that managers hired people like themselves. The stronger the personal preferences (e.g. extroversion/introversion), the more distinct (and limited) the resultant departmental culture. Your piece is a good reminder to cultivate a little diversity, both in our own range and in the people we surround ourselves with, whether at work, play or home.
ReplyDelete